morales_p_e

=E. Conclusion (150-200 words) Tips]=

> > It is difficult to raise a conclusion to this matter, since it raises many fundamental problems in history. What Kissinger undoubtedly achieved was the end of the War on the US side, and the removal of troops from the country (even though, one year later North Vietnam invaded the Southern part of the country) Kissinger had managed to achieve a cease fire, and the end of a too long lasting war (one of the longest ones in modern history). However, in the process of achieving this, Kissinger (as mentioned above) created a lot of collateral damages in the neighbouring country. But here we encounter ourselves in front of a TOK issue which is hard to resolve; does the end justify the means? Undoubtedly, the answer would be different for different people. But there is another issue to the matter; this issue is the significance nowadays of the Nobel Peace Prizes. Does the Nobel Peace Prize mean the same as what Nobel himself really wanted? Or has it simply become a meaningless symbol awarded to the most influential members of the state. Unfortunately, Hennery Kissinger was not the first controversial figure to obtain a Nobel Peace Prize, and will not be la last one, people like Al Gore, Obama, Yasser Arafat, Jimmy Carter and other individuals have obtained it for very dubious reasons, whereas people like Gandhi are still waiting for one… To answer the question, Henry Kissinger didn’t only do good in the Vietnam War, and maybe the fact the Le Duc Tho declined his Prize could tell us a bit more about Kissinger’s deserving of his.
 * 1) ## Conclusion

[Word Count: 269]