ia_2011_e_mendez

=E. Conclusion (150-200 words) Tips]=

In my opinion, the film Rasputin is not very useful to the historians studying the fall of the Tsarism as it tries to create an image against Rasputin and the revolutionaries. The film tries to show a likable Romanov family to achieve this, Uli Edel shows a bad-mannered and uneducated Rasputin and a cold revolutionaries. The murder of the Romanovs by the Revolutionaries is the most essential event to recognize the bias of the film. This moment illustrates the cruelty with what they killed the family, creating antagonism on the audience. The film is not very useful because it does not try to look at the situation occurred from different perspectives. It only considers the point of view of Nicholas II and his family. The film does only show the events made by the Revolutionaries against the Tsarism but it never explains why they acted like that. Superficially, the film narrates the situation of Russia at the time but without analyse the situation in depth. The film would be useful to understand how the Romanov family and their surroundings lived the final of their dynasty. Also to understand the reason of the apparition of Rasputin, but the movie is not very useful to understand why the Tsarism fall because for that the introduction of different points of view would be needed. // (221 words) //